Back

Integrating supervised and unsupervised machine learning for behavior segmentation reveals latent frailty signatures and improves aging clocks in isogenic and outbred mice

Sabnis, G.; Miao, D. M.; Kumar, V.

2026-03-25 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.23.713050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Manual frailty index (FI) assessment in mice is a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality, and is frequently used in mechanistic and translational geroscience. However, it is labor-intensive, requires expert training, and is vulnerable to scorer variability. We previously developed a visual frailty index (vFI) that objectively predicts age and frailty using expert-defined, supervised behavioral features extracted from open-field videos. However, relying solely on human-defined features may miss subtle, latent behavioral signatures of aging. Here, we test whether unsupervised behavioral discovery using Keypoint-MoSeq (KPMS) could uncover these hidden signatures and improve the prediction of aging-related outcomes. Using a large dataset of isogenic C57BL/6J (B6J) and genetically diverse Diversity Outbred (DO) mice, we find that unsupervised features are highly predictive of chronological age, biological frailty, and the proportion of life lived. Notably, while supervised features overall outperformed unsupervised features in these tasks, combining both feature sets yielded the highest predictive accuracy across all outcomes. Despite these improvements, models trained on either feature set failed to generalize across strains, confirming that behavioral manifestations of aging are strongly population-specific. These findings demonstrate that supervised and unsupervised machine vision provide complementary information, establishing a highly sensitive, scalable, and non-invasive framework for objective and scalable geroscience in rodents.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.0%
2
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
6
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
10
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
15
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%