Back

An FDA-Approved Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Reduces Biological Age in Healthy Adults: First Human Proof-of-Concept for Retrotransposon-Targeted Gerotherapeutics

Anderson, P. L.; Pang, A. P.; Coyle, R. P.; Schlachetzki, J.; Molina, A. J.; Bushman, L.; Aguado, J.; Hill, B.; Liu, A. Y.; Brooks, K. M.; Erlandson, K. M.; Corley, M. J.

2026-03-26 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349105 medRxiv
Show abstract

Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) used for HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis have been proposed as gerotherapeutics based on their capacity to suppress age-associated retrotransposon activity. However, evidence in humans is currently lacking. Here we evaluated DNA methylation-based measures of biological aging in healthy people without HIV (aged 18-50) using samples from two separate randomized, directly observed dosing pharmacokinetic studies of FDA-approved NRTI regimens containing emtricitabine-tenofovir-alafenamide (FTC/TAF;200 mg/25 mg) or FTC-tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF; 200 mg/300 mg) for 12 weeks. In the FTC/TAF study (N=36), epigenetic aging measures based on DNA methylation (DNAm) profiling decreased over follow-up, including DunedinPACE (-0.061, p=0.019) and PhenoAge (-6.33, p=0.008), with concordant reductions (p<0.05) across additional systems-specific epigenetic clocks including those estimating brain aging. DNAm-based proxies of inflammatory biomarkers also declined, with significant reductions in epigenetic IL-6 (-0.058, p=0.029) and a trend toward reduced C-reactive protein (-0.231, p=0.059). In contrast, the FTC/TDF study (N=43) showed no significant changes across epigenetic clocks and proxies. These findings are consistent with TAFs more favorable cellular pharmacology compared with TDF and support gerotherapeutic effects of FTC/TAF. Prospective placebo-controlled studies are warranted that integrate clinical pharmacology, direct transposable element readouts, and prespecified geroscience and DNA methylation-based aging endpoints.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
4
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.4%
6
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
12
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
14
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
28
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%