Back

Integrated Clinical and Network Pharmacology Study Reveals the Efficacy and Multi-Target Mechanism of Shenfu Injection in Septic Shock

Shi, Y.; Zhang, B.; Tian, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.

2026-03-25 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.03.20.26348945 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The high mortality of septic shock demands novel adjunctive therapies. Shenfu Injection (SFI), a traditional Chinese medicine, shows potential but its mechanism remains unclear. Method s We conducted an open-label, randomized trial in 80 patients with septic shock. Patients received standard care with or without adjunctive SFI for 7 days. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Key secondary outcomes included inflammatory markers, lactate clearance, and vasopressor duration. Concurrently, network pharmacology analyzed SFIs bioactive components, predicted targets, and enriched pathways, with validation by molecular docking. Results The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the SFI group (20.0% vs. 42.5%, P=0.030). SFI accelerated clinical improvement, evidenced by greater reductions in IL-6 and procalcitonin, higher 6-hour lactate clearance (35.2% vs. 18.5%, P<0.001), shorter vasopressor duration (48 vs. 72 hours, P<0.001), and more rapid SOFA score decline. Network pharmacology identified 145 SFI-septic shock common targets, with IL-6, SRC, and MAPK3 as central hubs. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment in TNF, PI3K-Akt, and IL-17 signaling pathways. Molecular docking confirmed strong binding of key SFI components (e.g., Ginsenoside Rh2) to core targets like IL-6. Conclusion s Adjunctive Shenfu Injection reduces mortality and improves clinical recovery in septic shock, potentially through a multi-target mechanism involving modulation of inflammatory and cellular signaling pathways. This integrative study provides both clinical evidence and a mechanistic framework supporting SFI's use. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800020435.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%