Back

Facilitators and barriers to dietary choices among older adults living in rural Edo, South-south, Nigeria

Idiakheua, O. D.; Williams, E. A.; Abass, O. A.; Idiakhua, E. J.; Ranawana, V.; Akparibo, R.

2026-03-23 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.16.26348208 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPopulation ageing is accelerating, with the fastest growth occurring in low-and middle-income countries. Adequate nutrition is central to healthy ageing, yet little is known about the factors shaping dietary behaviours among older adults in rural African settings, where structural constraints may strongly influence dietary choice. This study explored the facilitators and barriers influencing the dietary choices among older adults aged 60 years and above living in rural communities of Edo Central, Nigeria. MethodsThis exploratory qualitative study was guided by the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 older adults. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using NVivo 14, with findings mapped across individual, environmental, community, and policy/system levels of the SEM. ResultsFourteen subthemes were identified and organised into four overacting SEM domains. Individual drivers identified included a deep knowledge of nutrient-rich diets and a preference for natural, minimally processed foods, as well as community drivers, including cultural and traditional norms and market access, which were the facilitators. Environmental drivers, including physical and economic access, and policy/system drivers, including government policies/subsidies, food prices and inflation, were identified as the main barriers. ConclusionDietary choices among older adults in rural Nigeria are shaped predominantly by structural and food-system constraints rather than by individual knowledge alone. Policies aimed at improving nutrition in ageing populations should prioritise strengthening rural food systems, supporting smallholder agriculture, stabilising food prices, and developing targeted social protection programmes for older adults.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.8%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
5
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
9
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%