Walking in the Free World: Establishing Normative Trajectories for Ecological Assessment of Robust Gait Variability with Age
Tan, K. Z.; Friganovic, K.; Kim, Y. K.; Frautschi, A.; Gwerder, M.; Tan, K. Y.; Koh, V. J. W.; Malhotra, R.; Chan, A. W.-M.; Matchar, D. B.; Singh, N. B.
Show abstract
Gait variability is a critical functional indicator of dynamic balance and neurocognitive decline in health. Its translation into clinical practice is, however, challenged by a lack of age-related normative trajectories and reference values under real-world ecological settings. Furthermore, the conventional metrics used to estimate gait variability (Coefficient of Variation, CV; Standard Deviation, SD) have a fundamental methodological flaw: the inherent sensitivity of conventional metrics to the statistical outliers and environmental noise in real-world walking. In this study, we mitigate this factor by applying a robust statistical framework to quantify gait variability. Analysing a large-scale cohort of community-dwelling older adults (n=2,193), we first demonstrate that freeliving gait data follows a heavy-tailed distribution, necessitating the use of robust estimators like the Robust Coefficient of Variation (RCVMAD) and Median Absolute Deviation (MAD). Leveraging these metrics, we established the normative trajectory and reference values of real-world gait variability across the ageing lifespan, revealing a distinct, age-dependent increase in spatio-temporal fluctuations, indicating a decline in rhythmicity and steadiness with age. We further demonstrated the clinical utility of these robust metrics: RCVMAD consistently yielded larger effect sizes than conventional CV in discriminating between fallers and non-fallers across all gait parameters. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential of long-term unsupervised monitoring to capture intrinsic variability during real-world walking. Validated for consistency and reliability, this robust framework provides the necessary ecological validity to transform gait variability into a standardised, rapid clinical metric for assessing functional decline at an early timepoint.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and sensitivity of an inertial measurement unit-driven biomechanical model of motor variability for gait 95%
- Development and validation of 2D-LiDAR-based gait analysis instrument and algorithm 95%
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Network Analysis of Gait Speed Change Upon Transition to Uneven Surfaces in Older Adults 94%
- The association of skeletal muscle energetics with recurrent falls in older adults within the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) 92%
- Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a smartphone embedded inertial measurement unit for measuring postural stability in older adults 97%
- Does increased gait variability improve stability when faced with an expected balance perturbation during treadmill walking? 96%
- How Healthy Older Adults Enact Lateral Maneuvers While Walking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Soleus Redistributes Lower-Limb Joint Work Distally in Young and Older Adults 94%
- Speeding up, not slowing down, decreases the energy needed to control walking balance 94%
- Transtibial amputation increases the metabolic energy needed for stabilizing walking in the sagittal plane 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.