Back

Trends in the representation of research on model organisms in scientific literature

Fallon, C.; Li, X.; Alvarez Canales, G.; Museridze, M.; Gompel, N.

2026-03-09 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.03.03.709331 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Research using model organisms to tackle questions in life sciences and biomedical sciences has been in the spotlight of scientific literature for the better part of the twentieth century. This attention has perceptibly faded over the last twenty years, at least. We set to document this process by examining the publication trends of 48 journals encompassing a broad range of topics and impact factors for eight classic model organisms. We found that the representation of model-organism research has been in continuous decline in the last three decades, with a significant acceleration since 2010. We investigated the origin of the change, from the size of research communities to the shifts in topics and in use of model organisms. While model organism communities appear stable, model organism papers are outpaced by the rest of scientific literature. Also, among papers using model organisms, we note a progressive shift toward applied research, with differences between different model organism species. The mouse, in particular, logically remains the preferred system to study diseases, while non-mouse model organisms continue to be used predominantly to dissect mechanisms of life. We reflect on the consequences of the fading representation that we measured for the future of life sciences. Fundamentally, model organisms afford a direct access to causality in life sciences and their fading from the picture may impact life sciences as a whole. More pragmatically, it will also affect funding, and thereby jeopardizes the maintenance of model organism resources such as repositories built over decades.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.3%
2
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
4
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%