Back

Benefits and Challenges of Integrating a Generative AI Assisted Reading Guide in an Undergraduate Journal Club Assignment

Ringer McDonald, A.; Vazquez, A. V.

2026-02-27 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.02.26.708236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developing scientific reading skills is critical for undergraduate STEM students due to scientific literatures unique formatting and use of specialized jargon. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT offer students the ability to ask questions about what they are reading interactively. Previously, we reported the development of a ChatGPT-assisted reading guide that combined structured, active reading strategies with using ChatGPT to clarify unfamiliar words and concepts in real time. In the initial study, undergraduates found the use of the ChatGPT-assisted reading guide helpful in their understanding of an abstract and introduction of a journal article. Here, the ChatGPT-assisted reading guide was used in a journal club assignment for an undergraduate chemistry course. ChatGPT transcripts were analyzed for common types of interactions, and students were surveyed about their experience. Overall, students reported that using the ChatGPT-assisted reading guide was helpful in understanding the article and helped them have more productive class discussions. However, some students also expressed skepticism about using AI tools, citing concerns about accuracy of AI-generated information and the effect of using AI on their own learning.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
4
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
26
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%