Back

The age paradox in post-infectious sequelae: physiological reserve outweighs chronological age in Long COVID susceptibility

Azhir, A.; Cheng, J.; Tian, J.; Bassett, I. V.; Patel, C. J.; Klann, J. G.; Murphy, S. N.; Estiri, H.

2026-02-26 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346989 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOlder age is widely considered a risk factor for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), typically attributed to immunosenescence and inflammaging. However, whether this association reflects intrinsic biological ageing or accumulated comorbidity burden remains unclear, with implications for clinical risk stratification. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Precision PASC Research Cohort (P2RC) from Mass General Brigham, comprising 133,792 COVID-19 patients from 12 hospitals and 20 community health centres in Massachusetts (March 2020-May 2024). PASC was ascertained using a validated computational phenotyping algorithm. We used generalised estimating equations with cluster-robust variance to model PASC risk, causal mediation analysis to decompose age effects through comorbidity burden and acute severity, and specification curve analysis across 768 analytical specifications to assess robustness. FindingsAfter adjustment for comorbidity burden, each decade of age was associated with 6% lower odds of PASC (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.93-0.95). Causal mediation analysis revealed that comorbidities accounted for 145% of the total age effect, indicating inconsistent mediation wherein ages direct protective effect was masked by its indirect harm through chronic disease accumulation. This protection was age-dependent: adults younger than 65 years retained robust resilience independent of comorbidities (ADE:-0.0042, p<0.001), whereas adults 65 years and older showed complete loss of this protection (ADE: +0.0020, p=0.14). InterpretationLong COVID susceptibility is driven by physiological reserve rather than chronological age until approximately age 65, beyond which age-related protective mechanisms become exhausted. Risk stratification should prioritise comorbidity burden over birth year in younger adults. FundingNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.1%
2
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
7
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%