Back

Neuroprotective Effect of Combined Pomegranate and Candesartan Therapy Against Chronic Cerebral Ischemia in Rats.

Awada, R.; Radi, F.; Abdelbaki, Z.; Hijazi, A.; Joumaa, W. H.; Ezzeddine, Z.; Martinez, L. O.; Nasser, M.

2026-02-24 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.23.707366 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStroke remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Ischemic stroke, caused by arterial occlusion, induces sensorimotor deficits and memory impairments. Excessive activity of the brain angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is associated with hypertension and cerebral ischemia. Candesartan (CN), an AT1R blocker, improves cerebrovascular blood flow. Pomegranate (Punica granatum) is rich in polyphenolic antioxidants that reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, suggesting potential neuroprotective effects in cerebral ischemia. AimThis study compared the neuroprotective effects of CN administered alone or in combination with pomegranate (POM) in a rat model of cerebral ischemia induced by chronic unilateral carotid artery ligation. MethodsCerebral ischemia was induced by ligation of the right common carotid artery (RCCA) in adult rats. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: sham control, untreated ischemic, ischemic treated with CN, and ischemic treated with CN + POM. Sensorimotor and cognitive functions were assessed 1-15 days post-surgery using beam balance (BB), beam walking (BW), modified sticky-tape (MST), novel object recognition (NOR), and the Morris water maze (MWM) tests. ResultsRCCA ligation induced marked sensorimotor deficits and memory impairments. Both CN monotherapy and CN + POM treatment equally restored sensorimotor function to sham-control levels, as demonstrated by BB, BW, and MST tests. In contrast, CN + POM treatment showed greater efficacy than CN alone in improving short-term recognition and spatial memory, as demonstrated by NOR and MWM performance. ConclusionCN effectively reverses ischemia-induced sensorimotor deficits, whereas the addition of POM confers specific and enhanced protection against cognitive impairment, indicating distinct mechanisms underlying sensorimotor and memory recovery after cerebral ischemia.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.8%
2
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
4
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%