Back

You cant manage what you cant imagine: The Digital Health Checklist-Risk Management (DHC-RM) Tool to enhance participant protections in digital health research

Card, A. J.; Vital, D.; Nebeker, C.

2026-02-24 health policy
10.64898/2026.02.22.26346854 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital health technologies are powerful-enhancing data collection, participant engagement, and personalized health interventions-yet their rapid proliferation has outpaced guidance for research participant protection. Current practice assists researchers in identifying risks but provides limited support for comprehensive risk management. To address this gap, we developed the Digital Health Checklist-Risk Management (DHC-RM) Tool, which integrates the established Digital Health Checklist with approaches from safety risk management. We conducted a study (n=40) comparing the DHC-RM Tool with current practice using a randomized experimental difference-in-differences design. Primary outcomes were the quantity, variety, and novelty of risks identified; secondary outcomes were the same constructs applied to risk control development. Compared with current practice, use of the DHC-RM Tool resulted in dramatically improved performance across all primary outcomes. Users identified on average 14.7 additional risks (compared to baseline) versus 0.26 in the control group and a higher number of risks in each of six pre-identified risk domains. Half of all distinct risks identified in the comparison phase were identified exclusively using the tool. The tool also improved risk control design, producing 9.63 additional risk control strategies per participant compared with 0.15 for current practice and yielding substantially greater novelty and variety. User feedback was also positive: 75% of participants reported they would use the tool again, citing its structured workflow, just-in-time examples, improved insight into risks, and its value for IRB communication. Suggestions for refinement focused primarily on expanding training examples and providing additional support for risk control development. The DHC-RM Tool significantly improves risk management practice in digital health research. By embedding structured, ethics-informed risk management into digital health research design, the DHC-RM Tool has the potential to improve participant protection while also streamlining ethics approval. Author SummaryDigital health research can put participants (and others) at risk in ways that dont always occur to the researchers who are designing a study. Researchers also face challenges in prioritizing risks and coming up with ideas to reduce those risks. We developed a new approach, the Digital Health Checklist - Risk Management Tool (DHC-RM Tool), to give researchers the support they need to identify, assess, and address research participant risks in this fast-moving field. Our experimental study found that use of the DHC-RM Tool led to a very large improvement in how well researchers managed the risks of digital health research studies. Using the toolkit, they were able to identify more risks than they identified using current practice-including risks they would not otherwise have considered. They were also able to come up with more changes to reduce the risks associated with digital health research studies, including changes they would not otherwise have considered. Those who used the toolkit found it beneficial and easy to use. The DHC-RM Tool fills an important gap in the science and practice of participant protection in digital health research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
7
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
9
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
25
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%