Back

Divergent uric acid responses to traditional Japanese diet and the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin in drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes

Kuto, E.; Kuto, A. N.; Urushibara, N.; Okada, R.; Ito, S.

2026-02-25 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.02.21.26346799 medRxiv
Show abstract

Uric acid (UA) is traditionally regarded as a metabolic risk marker; however, its dynamic behavior during glucose-lowering therapy remains incompletely understood. We compared UA responses to a modified traditional Japanese diet (MJDD) and the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with early-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this prospective observational study, drug-naive patients received MJDD (n=58) or alogliptin (n=52) monotherapy for 3 months. Changes ({Delta}) in serum UA were analyzed in relation to glycemic control, insulin resistance, adipose tissue insulin resistance (adipo-IR), and beta-cell function. Both interventions significantly reduced fasting blood glucose and HbA1c while paradoxically increasing serum UA and HOMA-B. Baseline UA was the primary determinant of {Delta}UA in both cohorts. MJDD significantly reduced body mass index, insulin, free fatty acids, HOMA-R, and adipo-IR, with effects most pronounced in subjects with baseline BMI >25. In contrast, alogliptin selectively reduced adipo-IR in leaner subjects (BMI <25). Across both treatments, {Delta}UA correlated positively with {Delta}HOMA-B and inversely with {Delta}HbA1c. Notably, during MJDD, {Delta}UA showed a paradoxical negative correlation with {Delta}BMI and {Delta}FBG, and a positive correlation with {Delta}FFA. Patients exhibiting the greatest UA increases demonstrated the most marked improvements in beta-cell function and, with MJDD, the greatest weight loss. These findings indicate that MJDD and alogliptin exert distinct metabolic effects in early T2DM, yet both link rising UA to enhanced beta-cell function, suggesting that UA may serve as a dynamic pharmacometabolic biomarker reflecting therapy-specific metabolic adaptation rather than metabolic deterioration.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
3
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%