Back

Eosinophil and eosinophil-derived novel leukocyte ratios are strong predictors of the severity of acute coronary syndrome patients

Chen, C.; Zhao, Z. H.; Xu, L.; Gao, J. N.; Liu, X.; Quan, X. Q.; Zhang, Y. H.

2026-02-27 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.02.20.26346670 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rapid prediction of the severity of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial for appropriate intervention in emergency department. Neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym) and monocytes (Mon) and their ratios (Neu/Lym, NLR; Mon/Lym, MLR NeuxMon/Lym, SIRI) are acknowledged to be associated with the prediction of the severity and adverse outcome of ACS patients. Here, we analysed retrospectively eosinophils (Eos) and Eos-derived novel ratios (Neu/Eos, NER; Mon/Eos, MER; Neu x Mon/Eos, SIII; Neu/Eos x Lym, NEL; Mon/Eos x Lym, MEL; Neu x Mon/Eos x Lym, SV) of first admitted 1053 ACS patients within 24 hours of symptom onset to predict ST-segment elevation of myocardial infarction (STEMI), high Gensini score (H) and cardiac dysfunction (Killip Classification l to III grades). Results showed that Eos was significantly decreased in ST (n=227), Gensini (H) (n=311) and Killip I group (n=237) (P<0.05). All Eos-derived ratios (NER, MER, SIII, NEL, MEL, SV) were significantly higher with diagnostic severity (ST, Gensini (H), and Killip I group (P<0.05). ROC analysis revealed that SIII and SV predicted ST and Gensini (H) with high specificity and sensitivity, which were similar to that of NLR, MLR and SIRI. Conclusion: Eos and Eos-derived ratios, SIII and SV in particular, are strongly linked to the prediction of the severity of ACS, along with those of well-established leukocyte ratios. The new ratios of Eos hold significant importance in emergency department for quick evaluation of ACS patients.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
14
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%