Back

Survival risk heterogeneity among patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab visualized by risk scores generated from deep learning method DeepSurv using tumor gene mutations

Nishiyama, N.

2026-02-22 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.15.26346303 medRxiv
Show abstract

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy have represented promising treatments for NSCLC patients leading to prolonged survival. However, the majority of patients with advanced NSCLC have a poor prognosis. The identification and development of biomarkers for stratifying responders and non responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors contribute to unravel the mechanism of immune checkpoint pathway and the immune tumor interaction underlying the responses and are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In this study, we analyzed the clinical and gene mutation data of NCSLC patients treated with nivolumab containing immunotherapy or nivolumab containing immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (the immunotherapy treated group, n=119) and chemotherapy alone (the chemotherapy alone treated group, n=991) extracted from the MSK CHORD dataset. A DeevSurv model, a deep learning based extension of the Cox proportional hazards model was trained to generate survival risk score of each patient with binary statuses of thirty one gene mutations as input features into the model. The thirty one genes were selected based on population level mutation frequency, patient level variance in mutation status, and univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses evaluating the association between the presence or absence of each gene mutation and overall survival. The performance of the trained DeepSurv model was evaluated on the test set of the immunotherapy treated group using the concordance indexes (C index). The trained model was subsequently applied without retraining to the entire chemotherapy alone treated group as a control. The resulting C indexes for the immunotherapy treated group and chemotherapy alone treated group were 0.789 and 0.483, respectively. All patients within each group were divided into high and low risk groups according to the median predicted risk score. Kaplan Meier survival curves of high and low risk groups (n=43 vs n=70) in the immunotherapy treated group revealed a significant separation (log rank p<0.001), whereas no separation was observed in chemotherapy alone treated group (p=0.62). In the combined cohort of the immunotherapy treated group and chemotherapy alone treated group, the interaction between the DeepSurv derived risk score and treatment modality was significant (HR for interaction 1.47, 95% CI from 1.32 to 1.65, p<0.005), suggesting the DeepSurv derived risk score predictive value specific to the immunotherapy. Principal component analysis and permutation importance analysis were performed as complementary analyses to assess individual genes associated with the DeepSurv derived risk score and identified ZFHX3, SMARCA4, ALK, BTK, and NOTCH2 as major contributors to survival risk stratification. Collectively. we suggested that nonlinear coupling pattern of 31 tumor gene mutation statuses in the DeepSurv model captures the heterogeneity of survival risk among nivolumab containing immunotherapy or nivolumab containing immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy treated patients with NSCLC which was visualized as clear separation between high risk and low risk groups divided by the median value of the risk scores.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
14
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
18
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
20
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%