Back

Disentangling physiological heterogeneity in retinal aging using a deep learning-based biological age framework

Chu, R.; Sun, A.; Qu, J.; Lu, M.

2026-02-16 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346265
Show abstract

Biological age estimators quantify aging-related variation but provide limited insight into organ-specific aging processes. The retina enables non-invasive visualization of microvascular and neural structures and has emerged as a promising modality for biological age prediction. However, existing retinal aging models typically produce unidimensional age estimates with limited interpretability. Here we develop a deep learning framework based on a large-scale vision foundation model to estimate retinal biological age from fundus images and to characterize the physiological heterogeneity underlying retinal aging. Using a reference cohort of 56,019 relatively healthy individuals, the model achieved a Mean Absolute Error of 2.48 years in age prediction. Analysis of age deviations in a real-world clinical cohort (n = 46,369) revealed non-linear associations with cardiometabolic risk and population heterogeneity in aging patterns. Integrating multidimensional physiological profiling, feature attribution and unsupervised analysis, we identified distinct retinal aging signatures associated with systemic inflammation and hemodynamic variation. To further characterize age-related deviations, we introduced a residual learning framework that decomposes retinal aging signals into a normative age-related component and additional components associated with physiological variation, achieving a Mean Absolute Error of 1.80 years on the independent healthy test set. This approach provides an interpretable representation of retinal aging and a framework for studying organ-level aging processes and their relationship to systemic health using large-scale imaging data.

Matching journals

1
GeroScience
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
#1
174× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 8%
2.6× avg
3
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 6%
4.8× avg
4
Aging Cell
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.4%
62× avg
5
Advanced Science
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.1%
55× avg
6
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 0.4%
15× avg
7
Science Translational Medicine
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 40 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
8
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 5%
4.8× avg
9
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 2%
7.8× avg
10
Cell Reports Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 49 published papers
Top 3%
8.3× avg
11
Aging
Impact Journals, LLC · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
9.4× avg
12
Biomedicines
MDPI AG · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg
13
JAMIA Open
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 35 published papers
Top 5%
4.3× avg
14
Communications Biology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
7.5× avg
15
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 5%
5.1× avg
16
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 28%
0.8%
17
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 12%
0.8%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
2.1× avg
19
Genome Biology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
20
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
Top 4%
3.9× avg
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 7%
2.7× avg
22
PLOS Computational Biology
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 141 published papers
Top 10%
0.7%