Back

Salivary Dysbiosis Aligns with an Olfactory-Cognitive Phenotype in Aging

de Coning, E.; Barve, A.; Alberti, L.; Bertelli, C.; Richetin, K.

2026-02-16 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346193 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundScalable, non-invasive markers for cognitive-decline risk are limited. Olfactory dysfunction is predictive, and oral dysbiosis is mechanistically linked to neurocognitive pathways. Hence, we tested whether pairing smell and global cognition with salivary microbiome profiling yields a targeted, clinically useful signal. MethodsWe enrolled 113 Memory Center attendees and community controls. Same-day MMSE, UPSIT, and saliva were obtained for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and cytokine measurement. Unsupervised k-means clustering on standardized MMSE-UPSIT defined two groups of participants: CNN (cognitively normal, normosmia) and CIH (cognitively impaired, hyposmia). Ordination and elastic-net models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and sequencing depth. Functions were inferred with PICRUSt2 and were integrated with taxa via DIABLO. ResultsOverall, the 16S-based microbial community structure was similar between groups, indicating minor compositional shifts. CIH showed enrichment of periodontal anaerobes (Porphyromonas, Treponema and Prevotella), whereas CNN retained nitrate-reducing commensals (e.g. Neisseria subflava, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus). Functional shifts showed mixed consistency with literature, aligning for outer membrane usher proteins and alkyldihydroxy phosphate synthase, but diverging for thiaminase, alpha-glucuronidase, and chemotaxis protein CheX. Most salivary cytokines levels did not differ between groups. ConclusionsThis integrated smell, cognition, and saliva workflow delineates an olfactory- cognitive phenotype linked to a targeted, potentially modifiable salivary dysbiosis, periodontal anaerobes vs nitrate-reducers, rather than diffuse salivary inflammatory elevation. This approach may support non-invasive triage and monitoring along the oral- brain axis, pending independent, longitudinal validation.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
5
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
12
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%