Back

Determinants of One-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture in U.S. Older Adults: A Socio-Ecological Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adeyemi, O.; Boatright, D.; Chodosh, J.

2026-02-11 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346053 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHip fracture remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults in the United States. The aim of this systematic and meta-analytical review is to synthesize available evidence on predictors of one-year mortality following hip fracture among older adults, guided by a socio-ecological framework. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus for U.S.-based studies published between 2010 and 2025 reporting one-year mortality after hip fracture. Studies were included if they evaluated predictors of mortality across pre-injury, perioperative, or post-discharge phases. Data were extracted on study design, population characteristics, mortality outcomes, and risk factors. Predictors examined in [≥]3 studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis was conducted for predictors with limited data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. ResultsTwenty-eight studies (n = 835,226) met inclusion criteria. Pooled one-year mortality was 21.8%, ranging from 7.1% to 54.4%. Advancing age and male sex were consistent non-modifiable risk factors. Comorbidity burden, including congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, and dementia, and measures of frailty and functional impairment were among the strongest predictors, often doubling mortality odds. Perioperative factors such as higher injury severity and delayed surgery, and post-discharge factors including hospital readmission, missed follow-up visits, and postoperative complications, were also associated with increased mortality. ConclusionOne-year hip fracture-related mortality remains high and stems from multifactorial causes. A multi-level, systems-oriented approach may be necessary to meaningfully reduce long-term mortality in this growing and vulnerable population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
4
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
7
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
9
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
BMC Nephrology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%