Back

Trajectories of pain and cognitive function: 22 years of evidence in mid-to-later life

Andres, S.; Cox, S. R.; Fawns-Ritchie, C.

2026-02-11 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345971 medRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic pain has been identified as a risk factor for cognitive decline in later life. However, most studies measure pain at a single time point and none have investigated whether variations in pain severity are associated with changes in cognitive function over time. This project aimed to assess the relationship between individual-level change in pain severity and decline in cognitive function over time. We used data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a cohort of nationally representative middle aged and older adults. Pain severity was measured at each wave using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate and severe) and cognitive function was assessed using 3 objective tests. We applied latent growth curve modelling, a method for longitudinal analysis, to 19,376 ELSA participants data collected over 11 waves, spanning more than 20 years, to examine the relationship between initial level and change of both pain and cognitive function. Adjusting for age and sex, worsening chronic pain severity was associated with accelerated decline in a general measure of cognitive function ({beta} = -0.053, p = 0.039). However, when additionally adjusting for ethnicity, socioeconomic status and comorbid chronic conditions, this association was attenuated to non-significance ({beta} = -0.025, p = 0.365). Greater initial pain severity was associated with steeper decline in cognitive function even in the fully adjusted model ({beta} = -0.104, p < 0.001). Our study suggests that baseline level of pain severity but not worsening pain severity is associated with steeper decline in cognitive function over time. SUMMARYAge- and sex-adjusted analyses find that higher baseline and worsening pain severity predict faster cognitive decline; only baseline pain remains significant after full adjustment.

Published in Pain (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.