Back

Interdependent Patient-Reported Outcome Patterns During Breast Cancer Pharmacotherapy: A Correlation-Based Analysis Using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23

Sutanto, H.; Savitri, M.; Hendarsih, E.; Ashariati, A.

2026-02-11 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345961 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundQuality-of-life (QoL) assessment is essential in breast cancer care, yet limited evidence describes how interrelated QoL domains change during pharmacotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate correlations among functional and symptom scales using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23, highlighting their ability to reveal multidimensional QoL patterns. MethodsA prospective observational study was conducted in two second-referral hospitals in Indonesia, enrolling 106 female breast cancer patients. QoL was assessed before and after pharmacotherapy using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23. Changes in scores ({Delta}) were computed, and interdomain relationships were analyzed using Spearmans rho. ResultsPhysical functioning correlated with role functioning ({rho} = 0.55, p <0.001), emotial functioning ({rho} = 0.33, p <0.001), and social functioning ({rho} = 0.31, p = 0.002). Role and social functioning were likewise correlated ({rho} = 0.32, p = 0.001), indicating that improvements across functional domains tended to occur in parallel. Symptom scales showed strong positive clustering, including fatigue with pain ({rho} = 0.37, p <0.001), insomnia ({rho} = 0.35, p <0.001), and systemic side effects ({rho} = 0.48, p <0.001). Functional and symptom domains generally exhibited inverse relationships: physical functioning negatively correlated with fatigue ({rho} = -0.40), pain ({rho} = -0.43), both p <0.001, and systemic side effects ({rho} = -0.26; p = 0.01). ConclusionThe QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 instruments effectively captured structured, clinically meaningful interdependencies. Functional improvements consistently aligned with symptom reductions, revealing coherent functional-symptom clustering. These findings underscore the sensitivity of QoL instruments to detect multidimensional patient-reported changes during breast cancer pharmacotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.3%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
6
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Gene Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
28
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%