Back

Development and Validation of Regression-based Neuropsychological Testing Norms for Peruvian adults to detect HIV-associated Neurocognitive Impairment

Diaz, M. M.; Enders, K.; Tovar-Ramirez, S.; Rodriguez-Angeles, Y.; Roldan, V.; Nolasco, M.; Zou, Y.; She, J.; Sotolongo, P.; Mejia, F.; Valcour, V.; Garcia, P. J.; Marquine, M. J.; Tsoy, E.

2026-02-11 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.09.26345550 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNeurocognitive impairment (NCI) remains common among people living with HIV (PWH), particularly in low- and middle-income countries where accurate diagnostic tools are limited. In Peru, the lack of locally validated neuropsychological (NP) normative data in Spanish poses a major barrier to diagnosing HIV-associated NCI, especially among PWH who develop NCI at younger ages. This study aimed to develop regression-based NP norms for young and middle-aged Spanish-speaking adults in Lima, Peru and validate the norms in demographically similar PWH to improve diagnostic precision of HIV-associated NCI. MethodsA total of 164 healthy adults without HIV from Lima completed a comprehensive NP battery assessing memory, attention, executive function, and language, which are commonly affected in HIV-associated NCI. Multiple regression models were used to consider the influence of age, years of education, and sex on raw scores, yielding standardized demographically-adjusted norms for the population. The resulting norms were then applied to 310 PWH from Lima and then compared with previously published norms for Spanish speaking adults to evaluate performance differences. ResultsAge and education were the strongest predictors of performance across tests, while sex had minimal influence. Compared to people without HIV, PWH had significantly lower educational attainment (mean 12.6 vs. 13.7 years) and exhibited significantly worse performance on normed scores of Benson Figure Copy, Benson Figure Delayed Recall, Color Trails 1 and 2, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, and WAIS-III Digit Symbol Coding, Digit Span, and Symbol Search. There were statistically significant differences between T-scores on nearly all tests between our population-specific norms and previously published norms in both directions, indicating potential over- and under-detection errors when applying norms from non-local samples. DiscussionOur findings highlight the utility of locally derived norms in detecting subtle cognitive changes among young and middle-aged PWH compared with previously published norms for Spanish-speakers. Application of these norms reveals significant between-group differences that may go undetected using non-local normative data or raw scores. Future efforts should focus on rural norm development and inclusion of individuals with lower educational backgrounds in Peru and other Latin American countries.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
43.5%
2
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
3
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
5
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
10
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
14
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
15
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%