Back

SenCat: Cataloging human cell senescence through multiomic profiling of multiple senescent primary cell types

Anerillas, C.; Altes, G.; Gresova, K.; Tsitsipatis, D.; Mazan-Mamczarz, K.; Banarjee, R.; Cunningham, A. S.; Salamini-Montemurri, M.; Yang, J.-H.; Munk, R.; Rossi, M.; Piao, Y.; Olinger, B.; Strassheim, Q.; Martindale, J. L.; Fan, J.; Cui, C.-Y.; De, S.; Rutherford, D. V.; Hao, Y.; Li, Z.; Roberts, J.; Qi, Y. A.; Abdelmohsen, K.; de Cabo, R.; Herman, A. B.; Maragkakis, M.; Basisty, N.; Gorospe, M.

2026-02-07 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.02.05.703986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is an urgent need to comprehensively catalog senescence markers across cell types in an organism in order to characterize senotypes and senescent cell heterogeneity. Here, we profiled the transcriptomes and proteomes in 14 different primary human cell types undergoing over 30 senescence paradigms to create a senescence catalog we termed SenCat. We found that, while senescent cells from all primary tissue types did not share a single unique marker, they did activate shared specific metabolic and damage-response pathways implicated in tissue repair. Machine learning analysis of the SenCat transcriptomic and proteomic datasets successfully identified independent sets of senescent human cells, and senescent-like cells in mouse lung and kidney. In sum, SenCat represents a much-needed resource to identify senescent cells across tissues in the body. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIIdentifying senescent cells in organisms in vivo remains a challenge C_LIO_LIWe created SenCat: a catalog transcriptomes and proteomes of senescent primary cells C_LIO_LIMachine learning (ML) analysis of SenCat identified robust senescence scores C_LIO_LIML-derived senescence scores uncovered senescent-like cell dynamics in vivo C_LI

Published in Molecular Cell (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.