Back

Prevention of Atopic Diseases with the Use of Hypoallergenic Infant Formula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vind, H. M.; Rasmussen, M. A.; Schoos, A.-M. M.

2026-01-28 allergy and immunology
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344870 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAtopic diseases are estimated to affect 30-40% of the global population. However, the potential protective effect of hypoallergenic infant formula against conditions such as atopic dermatitis (AD), cows milk protein allergy (CMPA), and asthma remains uncertain. ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating hypoallergenic formula for atopic disease prevention in high-risk infants. The primary outcome was AD and secondary outcomes were CMPA and asthma. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020. RCTs involving high-risk infants were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Exclusion criteria included interventions not initiated at birth, enrolment of sick infants, and non-RCTs. Pooled Relative Risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. ResultsWe included 9 RCTs that enrolled high-risk infants. The meta-analysis found a borderline significant protective effects of AD (RR=0.78 [0.59-1.03], p=0.059; I2=46.5%), a significant protective effect of hypoallergenic formula in prevention of CMPA (RR=0.51 [0.27-0.97], p=0.0228; I2=37.3%), and no significant risk reduction for asthma (RR=0.78 [0.51-1.20], p=0.059; I2=37.5%). ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis found no statistically significant protective effect of hypoallergenic formula for AD or asthma, though a non-significant trend toward risk reduction was observed. A significant risk reduction was seen for CMPA (RR{approx}0.5), although not all diagnoses were confirmed by oral food challenge. These findings suggest potential patient-specific benefits, but larger, well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm them.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.5%
2
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
5
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
8
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
Chemical Senses
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
27
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
28
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
29
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
30
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%