Back

Undergraduate student practicals generate high-quality data for microbiome research

Wilson, I.; Perry, T.; Grutzner, F.

2026-01-21 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.01.20.700693 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The increasing prominence and accessibility of microbiomics has provided an opportunity for authentic research experiences in the undergraduate practical classroom. In recent years, this approach has contributed to published research projects. However, there is little information evaluating the quality of student-generated data compared to that of trained researchers. To investigate this, we designed an undergraduate practical component in which 37 final-year genetics students generated microbial profiles of 22 echidna scats using matched samples that were also profiled by an experienced researcher. DNA yield, 16S PCR success, sequencing library size and microbial diversity were compared between the groups in order to assess both the ability and accuracy of students in characterising faecal microbiota. Our research revealed that students were able to produce research-grade microbiome data comparable to a postgraduate researcher. Importantly, we found that students did not introduce contamination at a higher rate than the trained researcher. These findings reinforce that the undergraduate classroom is a valuable approach for microbiome research in addition to its benefits for student engagement and experience. The design and successful implementation of these practicals provide a template for a variety of research-led microbiome teaching.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
15
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
22
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
24
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%