Back

Uncovering Conceptual Biases in DNA Stabilization: A Student-Led Investigation

Polo, C.; Thandi, A.; Chandler, O.; Lugert, P.; Hammond, A.; Madhi, T.; Ayala, M.; Berrigan, A. J.; Chen, A.; Gillett, K.; Sareen, M.; Yu, S.; Xiong, S.; Zuo, Y.-y.; Sanjeev, S.

2026-01-19 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.01.15.699716 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) stands as one of the most foundational concepts in life sciences, essential for students to master. However, when surveyed about the forces that stabilize the double-stranded DNA structure, many students exhibited a conceptual bias-- favoring base pairing as the primary stabilizing force, while overlooking the equally critical role of base stacking interactions. To investigate the origins of this misconception, students conducted a comprehensive analysis of 35 widely used textbooks. Their findings revealed that one-third of these texts explicitly emphasized base pairing as the sole stabilizing force in their written content. Furthermore, two-thirds of the textbook contained illustrations that reinforced this bias, visually highlighting base pairing while neglecting base stacking. Recognizing this bias, students embarked on a literature review to gain a more accurate and nuanced understanding of DNA stabilization. Through this research, we identified three concept areas--DNA structure and function, environmental effects on DNA, and DNA-protein interactions--to illustrate how base pairing and base stacking work in concert to stabilize the antiparallel double helical structure of DNA. This interplay between base pairing and base stacking is crucial not only for the structural integrity of DNA, but also for its biological functionality. By addressing this conceptual bias, we aim to promote a more balanced and scientifically accurate representation of DNA stabilization in educational materials.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
22
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Biophysical Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%