Predictors of intraoperative resectability among pancreatic cancer patients for curative-intent surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Chuabio, V.; Cion, R.; Arenos, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundSome pancreatic cancer patients for curative-intent surgery are found to actually have unresectable disease on laparotomy. This systematic review aimed to identify parameters that can potentially help predict intraoperative resectability status. MethodsLiterature search was done across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies since 2011 assessing for independent association of preoperative parameters with intraoperative pancreatic cancer resectability. Parameters investigated by at least two studies were identified. For discordant findings, meta-analyses using the random effects model were done, incorporating studies that can be pooled. Pooled odds ratios and mean differences were obtained for parameters with binary and continuous values, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were done for significant heterogeneity. ResultsFrom initially 8,959 articles searched, 18 studies were included, with 13 parameters identified for synthesis. Elevated serum CA19-9 (>35-1000 U/mL) and larger tumor size (>22-40 mm) were shown to independently predict intraoperative unresectability in the most number of studies. For parameters subjected to meta-analyses, abdominal pain, weight loss, lower body mass index (BMI), lower serum transaminases, and preoperative borderline resectability were significantly associated with intraoperative unresectability, while age and sex were not. Subgroup analyses addressing heterogeneity revealed that tumor location in the pancreatic body/tail is significantly associated with actual unresectability whereas poorer performance status was not. Other parameters shown to have predictive value but could not be included in meta-analyses are serum CA125 and imaging-to-surgery time interval. ConclusionSynthesis of studies has shown that elevated serum CA19-9 and larger tumors are independently associated with intraoperative pancreatic cancer unresectability. Other predictive factors include abdominal pain, weight loss, lower BMI, lower serum transaminases, preoperative borderline resectability, and tumor location in the pancreatic body/tail. Staging laparoscopy or neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer patients with these attributes. What is already known on this topicAccurate identification of patients with actual resectable pancreatic cancer remains challenging despite resectability criteria. Some parameters beyond resectability criteria have been found to offer clues regarding actual resectability. What this study addsSynthesis of studies has determined which clinical, laboratory, and radiologic parameters outside of resectability criteria may predict intraoperative resectability among pancreatic cancer patients being considered for curative-intent surgery. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyThe findings in this study may aid in deciding which pancreatic cancer patients should undergo staging laparoscopy first instead of directly attempting curative surgery. Research gaps have also been identified.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PDAC-ANN: an artificial neural network to predict Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma based on gene expression 93%
- Comparative Immune profiling in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression Among South African patients 93%
- The Concept of Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) as a New Prognostic Biomarker for Lipid-driven Cancers Holds True in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 94%
- Renalase is a novel tissue and serological biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 94%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 93%
- Safety and efficacy of long-acting insulins (degludec and glargine) among type 2 diabetic Asian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 94%
- p16 Expression and its correlation with the clinical pathological characteristics of cervical cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-Analysis 94%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 91%
- Social Determinants of Health Factors Associated with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Prevalence and Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 90%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.