Back

Systolic Blood Pressure Time in Target Range and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Li, X.; Ji, G.; Bai, M.; Shi, H.; Yang, L.; Zhu, X.; Li, R.; Li, J.; Lv, H.; Zhao, P.; Chen, S.; Wu, Y.; Hui, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.

2025-12-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2025.12.24.25342993 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDWhether systolic blood pressure (SBP) time in target range (TTR) associates with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) in hypertensive patients remains unclear. METHODSBetween December 2020 and August 2023, participants were prospectively included from the Kailuan study. TTR was calculated using linear interpolation with the SBP target range between 120 and 140 mm Hg from 2006 to 2020. Beginning in 2020, brain MRI was conducted to identify CSVD burden and imaging markers, namely, lacunes (LAs), cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs), and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between SBP-TTR and imaging markers of CSVD. RESULTSA total of 797 patients with hypertension were included from the Kailuan Study. Compared with the lowest tertile, the highest tertile of SBP-TTR was associated with a reduced risk of EPVS (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.96; P = 0.029) and WMHs (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.97; P = 0.033). This association was independent of SBP variability. No significant associations were found between SBP-TTR and LAs (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.43-1.12; P = 0.133) or CMBs (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43; P = 0.869). Subgroup analysis suggested that the protective effect of a higher SBP-TTR against EPVSs was more pronounced in men, participants aged [≥]65 years, those with a follow-up duration of [≥]5 years, and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONSA higher SBP-TTR is significantly associated with a reduced risk of EPVSs and WMHs, independent of SBP variability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.