Predicting recovery outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury in an Australian community cohort: results from the Concussion Recovery Study (CREST)
Thorne, J.; Keeves, J.; Gozt, A. K.; Cowen, G.; Thomas, E.; Ring, A.; Chih, H.; Beaton, C.; Buhagiar, F.; Jefferson, A.; Papini, M.; Arendts, G.; Celenza, A.; Smedley, B.; Van Schalkwyk, S.; Iliff, J. C.; Ghedina, N.; Young, R.; Marton, M.; Robinson, S.; Licari, M.; Xu, D.; Honeybul, S.; Bynevelt, M.; Fatovich, D.; Hellewell, S.; Fitzgerald, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMost people recover well following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), however some experience persisting post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) for months or years. Our aims were (i) to evaluate the presence and impact of PPCS on return to functional activities over a 12-month period; and (ii) identify pre-, peri- and post-injury factors predictive of PPCS in an Australian community-based cohort at 3- and 12-months. MethodsAdults (18-65 years) with mTBI were assessed by telephone within 7 days post-injury to capture demographics, pre-injury health status, injury circumstances (including mechanism, site of head impact) and symptoms. The primary outcome measure was the presence of PPCS, measured with the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Logistic regression identified predictors of PPCS at 3- and 12-months. ResultsOf 232 participants, 49.7% had PPCS at 3-months and 45.6% at 12-months. Return to work was 96.7% at 3-months and 96.9% at 12-months, despite nearly 50% reporting PPCS. Participants with a high initial symptom burden (PCSS [≥]30) were six-times more likely to experience PPCS at 3-months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.17, 95%CI 2.63-14.46) and three-times as likely to have PPCS at 12-months (aOR 2.70, 95%CI 1.01-7.23). Acute symptoms of "feeling slow" or "nervousness" predicted PPCS at 3-months (aOR 2.97 and 2.74, respectively), but not at 12-months. ConclusionOf those who completed follow-up, nearly half had persistent symptoms at 12-months, often continuing to work despite symptoms. High initial symptom severity and acute symptoms may help clinicians identify those needing early targeted follow-up to reduce the burden of PPCS.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of cognitive-motor function in women who have experienced intimate partner violence-related brain injury 94%
- Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury 93%
- Subconcussive preconditioning prevents microglial morphology changes and improves cognitive outcomes in mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atypical somatic symptoms in adults with prolonged recovery from mild traumatic brain injury 92%
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 92%
- Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in community-dwelling older adults at moderate-to-high fall risk: The PRE.C.I.S.A. Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 92%
- Modified FRAX Score for Prediction of Fall-induced Hip Fractures; The Added Value of Fall Energy, Number, and Social Vulnerability Index 91%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 92%
- Assessment of Standard HIV Testing Services Delivery to Injured Persons Seeking Emergency Care in Nairobi, Kenya: A Prospective Observational Study 89%
- Social support and ideal cardiovascular health in urban Jamaica: a cross-sectional study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.