Back

A low dose of simvastatin enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in skin wound healing in diabetic mice associated with increases in pAkt, SDF-1, and angiogenesis

Sukpat, S.; Israsena, N.; Wongphoom, J.; Ingrungruanglert, P.; Sim, T. M.; Patumraj, S.

2019-09-09 physiology
10.1101/763417 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeWe aimed to determine the possible mechanisms of underlying the effects of low dose simvastatin on enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of MSC transplantation in diabetic wound healing.\n\nMethodsBalb/c nude mice were divided into five groups:- control mice (CON), diabetic mice (DM), diabetic mice pretreated with low-dose simvastatin (DM+SIM), diabetic mice implanted with MSCs (DM+MSCs) and diabetic mice pretreated with low-dose simvastatin and implanted with MSCs (DM+MSCs+SIM). Seven days before wound induction, low dose simvastatin was orally administered to the DM+SIM and DM+MSCs+SIM groups. Eleven weeks after the induction of diabetes, all mice were given bilateral full-thickness excisional back skin wounds.\n\nResultsBy comparing the DM+MSCs+SIM and DM+MSCs groups, the results showed that on day 14; the wound closure (%WC) and capillary vascularity (%CV) in the DM+MSCs+SIM group were significantly increased compared to those in the DM+MSCs group. In addition, by using immunohistochemical techniques, it was also shown that the expression of SDF-1, a chemotactic factor regulating the migration of stem cells, in the DM+SIM+MSCs group was increased compared with that in the DM+MSCs group. Furthermore, using phospho-Akt (S473) Pan Specific DuoSet IC ELISA (R&D Systems, USA) kits, the increased tissue Akt levels were found in the DM+SIM+MSCs group but not in the other groups.\n\nConclusionsOur study suggests that a low dose of simvastatin enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs in diabetic wound healing, and this effect was associated with increases in pAkt levels, SDF-1 levels, and angiogenesis, and improved wound closure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.