Back

Silylation of hydroxychloroquine enhances autophagy inhibition and antiproliferative activity in breast and pancreatic cancer cells

Williams, M. J.; Singh, A. K.; Wittmer, M. D.; Anderson, G. W.; Ronayne, C. T.; Mereddy, V. R.

2025-12-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.11.26.690890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAutophagy is a key survival mechanism in cancer, and chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are widely used late-stage autophagy inhibitors. However, their low potency and the need for high doses limit antitumor efficacy and raise concerns about off-target toxicity. We therefore designed hydroxychloroquine silyl derivatives based on the hypothesis that increasing lipophilicity at the terminal 2-hydroxyethyl moiety enhances lysosomal accumulation and autophagy inhibition while preserving the 4-aminoquinoline pharmacophore. MethodsThree HCQ silyl ethers-OTBS (2), OTIPS (3), and ODPS (4) have been synthesized by silylating the terminal hydroxyl of HCQ. Antiproliferative activity and autophagic flux along with apoptosis have been assessed for LC3B-II, p62/SQSTM1, and caspase-3-mediated PARP-1 cleavage. Results and DiscussionThe HCQ silyl derivatives retain the core pharmacophore and display improved or comparable antiproliferative activity relative to HCQ, achieving low-micromolar IC50 values. Candidate compounds 2 and 3 strongly induce LC3B-II and p62 accumulation than HCQ, consistent with enhanced blockade of autophagic flux. This autophagy disruption is accompanied by increased PARP-1 cleavage, particularly in aggressive 4T1 and MIAPaCa-2 cells, linking reinforced lysosomal/autophagy inhibition to apoptotic signaling. ConclusionThese findings show that silylation of HCQ enhances autophagy inhibition and pro-apoptotic activity while maintaining pharmacology, identifying HCQ silyl derivatives as promising leads for autophagy-targeting antitumor agents.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.