Exercise-Induced Functional Recovery in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury: A 12-Week High-Intensity Prospective Study
Baniya, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundExercise-induced functional recovery in neurological disorders remains under-optimized despite known neuroplastic benefits. High-intensity, multimodal training may support functional improvements, but evidence from structured clinical programs remains limited. ObjectivesTo examine functional changes associated with a 12-week combined aerobic and resistance exercise program in adults with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI). MethodsIn this prospective, single-group, quasi-experimental study, 43 consecutive patients (mean age 54.3 +/-14.1 years; 80% stroke, 20% TBI) at a tertiary neurorehabilitation center completed a supervised exercise intervention (3 sessions/week, 60-75 min). Aerobic training targeted 60-80% heart rate reserve and resistance training targeted 70-80% 1-RM. The primary outcome was change in Barthel Index (BI). Secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). Changes were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA; normality was checked with Shapiro-Wilk and paired t-tests were used as robustness checks. Effect sizes are reported as partial eta^2 and Cohens d. ResultsAll 43 participants completed the program (100% adherence) with no adverse events. BI increased from 41.0 +/-22.1 to 70.2 +/-19.5 (mean change +29.2 +/-13.8; F(1,42) = 178.4, p < 0.001, eta^2 = 0.81), with 79% exceeding the MCID. FMA rose by +15.9 +/-6.4 (F(1,42) = 152.6, p < 0.001, eta^2 = 0.78), BBS increased by +12.9 +/-11.1 (F(1,42) = 98.3, p < 0.001, eta^2 = 0.70), and 10MWT improved by +0.25 +/-0.10 m/s (F(1,42) = 124.7, p < 0.001, eta^2 = 0.75), with 86-93% of participants exceeding published MCIDs across measures. Paired t-tests confirmed these findings (all p < 0.001). Given the single-group design and early enrollment (median 6.2 weeks), observed gains should be interpreted as observational changes rather than definitive causal effects. ConclusionsA 12-week high-intensity combined aerobic and resistance program was safe, feasible, and associated with substantial improvements in functional independence, motor performance, balance, and gait. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the interventions causal impact and long-term benefits.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 97%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 96%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 96%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 96%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 97%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 95%
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 95%
- Speed-dependent biomechanical changes vary across individual gait metrics post-stroke relative to neurotypical adults 94%
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.