Health Care Student Orientations to Giving and Using Feedback in Workplace Learning: The Dual-role Feedback Orientation Scale
de Kleijn, R. A. M.; Tielemans, C. J. M.
Show abstract
Health professions education should prepare students to engage in feedback dialogues at the workplace. Studies often focus on students either giving or using feedback, and an instrument to address both dialogical roles is not yet available. Therefore, we adapted and extended the Feedback Orientation Scale into the Dual-role Feedback Orientation Scale (DrFOS). The DrFOS comprised 30 items, with separate User and Giver scales for Utility, Accountability, and Self-efficacy. The questionnaire was completed by 537 undergraduate 4-5th year medical and nursing students. Exploratory factor analyses showed that the User and Giver subscales could be meaningfully and reliably discerned. Students reported remarkably high User Utility scores, thus believe that feedback is indispensable to learn. Their Self-Efficacy as Givers was relatively low. Additional cluster analysis indicated that students had either high or low overall dual-role feedback orientations, or seemed to value using feedback but did not feel very accountable or competent either as giver or as user. The findings show that the DrFOS is worthwhile using in future research in health professions education. These studies could adopt longitudinal or intervention designs and explore the relations of Dual-role Feedback Orientation to other relevant outcome measures.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 93%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Undergraduate students with and without mental health concerns have different perceptions of disclosing mental health challenges to instructors 94%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 94%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of interview and social media data 92%
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 92%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 92%
- Machine Learning in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Education: A Survey of Postgraduate Students at a Swiss University 92%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.