Back

Cultural engagement is related to decelerated physiological but not subjective age: doubly-robust estimations in a national cohort study

Fancourt, D.; Finn, S.; Mak, H. W.; Steptoe, A.; Bloomberg, M.

2025-10-24 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.10.23.25338631 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cultural engagement (e.g. going to live music events and theatre performances, museums, galleries and exhibitions, and the cinema) is longitudinally associated in repeated epidemiological studies with age-related mental and physical health outcomes. However, it is unclear whether it also influences how fast older adults age physiologically - so-called age acceleration. This study aimed to ascertain whether regular cultural engagement amongst older adults is related to slower physiological ageing using a previously-derived physiological age index and a doubly-robust estimation approach to account for confounders. Using older adults from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n=4,467), we found that cultural engagement was related to lower physiological age cross-sectionally (average treatment effect -2.17; 95% CI -3.48 to -0.86), and 4 and 8 years later. The effect was seen consistently for all three types of cultural activity explored (cultural performances, museums/exhibitions, and the cinema). These analyses were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses, including considering alternative confounding structures, outliers, and treatment specification. Overall, these findings provide insight into how cultural engagement may be related to processes of ageing.

Published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
◐ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
eBioMedicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
◐ 26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
European Journal of Epidemiology
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
GeroScience
○ 109 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
Clinical Epigenetics
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · published here
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
BMC Geriatrics
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
Aging
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
14
Age and Ageing
◐ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
PLOS Medicine
● 110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
American Journal of Epidemiology
◐ 67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
17
Aging Cell
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
18
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
19
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.7%
21
Demographic Research
● 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
23
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Epigenetics
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
BMC Medicine
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Experimental Gerontology
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
28
BMC Public Health
○ 158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
29
eClinicalMedicine
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.