Back

A predictive model for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive children

Liu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, T.; Bao, M.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L.

2025-10-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.10.15.25338126 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs current electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria are of low diagnostic value compared with echocardiography (ECHO) for LVH, establishing a more effective ECG predictive model is necessary. ObjectiveTo develop and validate model to improve the diagnostic capability of ECG for LVH in pediatric primary hypertension. MethodsA retrospective study of 502 hypertensive children were recruited in the study between January 2019 and December 2024. The cohort were randomly divided into train (n=402) and test sets (n=100) with a proportion of 8:2. LVH was diagnosed using ECHO criteria. A total of 22 ECG parameters were evaluated. A predictive nomogram was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. ResultsLVH was identified in 117 (29.1%) of the training set and 29 (29.0%) of the test set. Body mass index (BMI), RI + SV4, and SD + SV4 were identified as independent predictors of LVH. The nomogram model showed good performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.822 in the training set and 0.803 in the test set. Calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good agreement between predicted and actual probabilities. DCA demonstrated clinical usefulness. The model outperformed previous models, as confirmed by NRI and IDI. ConclusionsThe nomogram model incorporating BMI, RI + SV4, and SD + SV4 significantly improves the ECG diagnosis of LVH in pediatric primary hypertension. The model offers a reliable tool for the early detection of LVH in hypertensive children.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.