The Promise of mRNA Cancer Vaccines: Potential Lives Saved and Economic Value in the U.S.
Wells, C. R.; Pandey, A.; Bawden, C.; Bilori, B.; Ye, Y.; Potter-Schwartz, L.; Ayaz, L.; Fitzpatrick, M. C.; Galvani, A. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently announced plans to curtail investment in messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine development, despite the central role played by the platform in preventing millions of deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Beyond infectious diseases, mRNA vaccines are showing promise in oncology, where early-phase clinical trials report meaningful improvements in overall and recurrence-free survival. Evaluating the potential public health and economic value of these therapies is critical for informing funding decisions. MethodsWe reviewed ongoing mRNA cancer vaccine clinical trials and extracted available survival outcomes. To project potential impact of mRNA vaccination on overall survival, we combined trial-based improvements in survival with incidence and demographic-adjusted survival rates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of National Cancer Institute. A logistic regression framework estimated one- and three-year survival gains. We then applied the Value of a Statistical Life Year (VSLY, $604,000; 3% discount rate) provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to quantify the economic implications of forgoing mRNA investment. ResultsIn a single annual U.S. cohort of patients newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma, mRNA vaccination could potentially avert approximately 49,000 deaths within three years of diagnosis. These projected survival gains translate to an estimated economic value of $75 billion. ConclusionsOur findings underscore the substantial public health opportunity provided by mRNA cancer vaccines. Curtailing federal investment risks forfeiting these benefits, while sustained support could accelerate clinical translation and preserve infrastructure essential for future pandemic preparedness.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Infection by SARS-CoV-2 with alternate frequencies of mRNA vaccine boosting for patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment for cancer 93%
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study 91%
- NF2 Loss-of-Function and Hypoxia Drive Radiation Resistance in Grade 2 Meningiomas 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study 93%
- Factors indicating intention to vaccinate with a COVID-19 vaccine among older U.S. Adults 93%
- Survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a SEER-based retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States 93%
- Evaluation of Potential Adverse Events Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older: A Self-Controlled Study in the U.S. 93%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 92%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 92%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.