Back

Retinal perfusion delay associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: A possible role of intracranial pressure?

Lee, Y. K.; Chang, Y. Y.; Jang, H. N.; Ma, D. J.; Song, H. B.

2025-09-26 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.09.25.25336128 medRxiv
Show abstract

Recent studies have suggested an association between GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment and increased risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, particularly within the first year of treatment. This study investigated potential mechanisms by examining retinal perfusion changes in both humans and mice during GLP-1RA therapy. We first compared six patients who underwent fluorescein angiography during GLP-1RA treatment with three patients after treatment completion. Two cases in a during-treatment group showed increased arteriovenous transit time. To validate these findings, we treated wild-type mice with liraglutide and measured retinal perfusion parameters before, during, and after treatment. Mice exhibited delayed injection-to-retina time and increased arteriovenous transit time during treatment, and decreased scotopic b-wave responses and increased hypoxia-related gene expression indicating retinal hypoxia, with recovery after treatment discontinuation. Investigation of mechanisms revealed that GLP-1RA-treated mice had significantly reduced intracranial pressure (ICP) at day 7, corresponding with the timing of retinal perfusion delays, and there was a trend toward a negative correlation between ICP and injection-to-retina time. Reduced ICP may affect ophthalmic vessels in the subarachnoid space, contributing to delayed retinal perfusion. These findings suggest that ocular circulation may be particularly vulnerable to GLP-1RA-related hemodynamic effects, independent of systemic cardiovascular changes. These results indicate that careful monitoring of ocular circulation may be warranted in individuals using GLP-1RA, and suggest the need for further investigation of temporal ICP changes in human patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.