Back

Risk Assessment of Unregulated Biological Sample Handling Among Postgraduate Students: A Mixed-Methods Study

Dhahir, A. M.; Nagmesh, S. A.

2025-09-22 public and global health
10.1101/2025.09.20.25336242 medRxiv
Show abstract

This mixed-methods study assessed the risks of unregulated biological sample handling among postgraduate students in Iraq. Quantitative data, gathered from a single survey completed by 172 participants and analyzed descriptively, revealed widespread challenges in obtaining samples (71.5%) and accessing equipped laboratories (78.5%), driving students to rely on commercial labs (65.1%) and informal peer exchange (51.7%). Twenty-five semi-structured interviews further elucidated these findings, revealing underlying reasons such as material shortages and poor university lab infrastructure (mentioned in 21 interviews). Both methodologies indicated high risk awareness (91.3% of survey respondents acknowledged risks; 16 of 25 interviewees recognized them), yet students continue these practices out of necessity. Interviews particularly emphasized a severe lack of adequate and practical biosafety training (indicated by 15 interviews). Crucially, in the absence of specialized governmental biosecurity agencies in Iraq, these unregulated practices heighten the risk of sensitive biological materials reaching unauthorized hands or being misused.

Published in Global Biosecurity · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS Global Public Health
● 344 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Epidemics
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
◐ 16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Public Health in Practice
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Public Health
○ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
10
BMC Public Health
○ 158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Open Research Europe
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
14
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
BMJ Global Health
● 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
○ 120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
PLOS Water
● 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
23
Journal of Environmental Management
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.