Back

Motor Cortex Coverage Predicts Signal Strength of a Stentrode Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface

Schone, H. R.; Yoo, P.; Fry, A.; Chetty, N.; Sawyer, A.; Herbers, C.; Liu, F.; Moon, C. H.; Hill, K.; Majidi, S.; Harel, N.; G. Nogueira, R. G.; Levy, E. I.; Putrino, D.; Lacomis, D.; Oxley, T. J.; Weber, D. J.; Collinger, J. L.

2025-09-25 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.09.19.25335875 medRxiv
Show abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are an emerging assistive technology for individuals with motor impairments, enabling the command of digital devices using neural signals. The Stentrode BCI is an implant, positioned within the brains neurovasculature, that can record movement-related electrocortical activity. Over 5 years, 10 participants (8 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 1 primary lateral sclerosis, 1 brainstem stroke) have been implanted with a Stentrode BCI and significant inter-participant variability has been observed in the recorded motor signal strength. This variability warrants a critical investigation to characterize potential predictors of signal strength to promote more successful BCI control in future participants. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between Stentrode BCI motor signal strength and a variety of user-specific factors: (1) clinical status, (2) pre-implant functional activity, (3) peri-implant neuroanatomy, (4) peri-implant neurovasculature, and (5) Stentrode device integrity. Data from 10 implanted participants, including clinical demographics, pre- and post-implant neuroimaging and longitudinal Stentrode BCI motor signal assessments were acquired over a year. Across all potential predictors, the strongest predictor of Stentrode motor signal strength was the degree to which the Stentrode BCIs deployment position overlapped with primary motor cortex (M1). These findings highlight the importance of targeting M1 during device deployment and, more generally, provides a scientific framework for investigating the role of user-specific factors on BCI device outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.