Back

An adapted health system inequity framework for avoidable inflammatory bowel disease admissions: A scoping review

Hawkins, R. L.; Bulter, K.; Sampson, F.; Lobo, A. J.; Hind, D.

2025-09-08 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.09.08.25335323 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInequalities in healthcare may be driving unplanned and potentially avoidable hospital admissions for people diagnosed with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Interventions to reduce unplanned and potentially avoidable admissions need to be developed based on a clear conceptual framework. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the health system components for reducing unplanned IBD admissions to develop a conceptual framework to guide future interventions for reducing unplanned admissions. MethodsA scoping review was conducted to identify literature exploring factors associated with unplanned IBD admissions and interventions to reduce IBD admissions. Literature published between January 2000 and October 2024 was identified from four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Pubmed). A narrative synthesis presented the findings, guided by Candidacy Framework, to understand issues in healthcare access. Results and conclusionsOf 1980 records identified, 17 were included. Avoidable IBD admissions result from inequity across the patient journey through healthcare specifically in access to: (1) earlier intervention during a flare, (2) specialist clinical advice about symptoms and psychosocial issues, (3) rapid access to outpatient care, (4) patient education, (5) systems that support self-management, (6) proactive care strategies, and (7) collaborative health professional working and referrals. Addressing service permeability (ease of using services) and local production of candidacy (patient-provider relationships and macro-structural conditions) are understood as most important for addressing avoidable unplanned IBD admissions. The Health System Inequity Framework is useful for understanding how services need to address patient care. Brief summarySome unplanned and potentially avoidable hospital admissions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be avoided through improved access, experience, and outcomes of healthcare. This scoping review developed a framework outlining how avoidable IBD admissions could be reduced by healthcare service interventions, informing healthcare providers and commissioners of potential interventions. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known?C_ST_ABSSome unplanned hospital admissions for people with inflammatory bowel disease could be avoided through reducing the existing disparities in healthcare access, experience and outcomes. What is new here?This review is the first to synthesise the current evidence on avoidable IBD admissions, producing a health system inequity framework outlining possible healthcare interventions for reducing avoidable unplanned IBD admissions. How can this study help patient care?The new health system inequity framework can inform healthcare providers and commissioners of IBD services of the possible interventions for reducing avoidable IBD admissions, therefore improving patient care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
8
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%