Mendelian Randomization Indicates Enhanced Lipid Control is Essential for Omega-3's Cardiovascular Protection
YU, J.; LI, C.; LIU, Z.; CHEN, Y.; LEI, Y.; LI, D.; MA, W.; WANG, Y.; YANG, Y.; WANG, R.; WANG, Y.
Show abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe association between omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease has been examined in populations with established disease. However, the definitive role of omega-3 fatty acids in cardiovascular risk remains inconclusive, and evidence from general populations is still limited. This study aims to examine the causal relationship between omega-3 and cardiovascular disease using large-scale genetic data. MethodsWe employed five well-established mendelian randomization (MR) methods to investigate the causal association between omega-3 and cardiovascular events. Two large independent omega-3 GWAS (>110,000 participants each) from general populations were analyzed across 14 cardiovascular and metabolic phenotypes (>50,000 participants each). To understand the direct effect of omega-3 on coronary artery disease (CAD), multivariable MR (MVMR) model and mediation analysis were conducted. Summary-data-based MR (SMR) was applied to identify circulating proteins associated with omega-3 levels. ResultsGenetically elevated omega-3 levels were found associated with increased cardiovascular risk across all MR methods, particularly for CAD (Pmedian = 2.65E-04), myocardial infarction (Pmedian = 1.03E-07) and heart failure (Pmedian = 4.84E-03). Higher genetically predicted omega-3 were linked to elevated LDL-C (Pmedian = 2.50E-33) and its key component apolipoprotein B (Pmedian = 5.60E-08), while reducing triglyceride levels (Pmedian = 4.16E-03). Notably, after adjusting for the genetic effect of LDL-C, omega-3 demonstrated a protective effect on CAD ({beta}combined = -0.025, Pcombined = 0.022), which was strengthened by adjusting for both LDL-C and triglycerides. Mediation analysis suggests that omega-3 is likely to increase CAD risk through elevating LDL-C (P median = 2.40E-12), highlighting the need for effective LDL-C management to maximize the cardiovascular benefits of omega-3. Circulating proteins, such as ANGPTL3 (Psmr = 1.22E-27) and PCSK9 (Psmr = 1.15E-21), were also found positively associated with omega-3 levels. A reanalysis of clinical trial data confirmed that the cardiovascular benefits of omega-3 were closely related to the intensity of LDL-C lowering therapy. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the cardiovascular benefits of omega-3 fatty acids may depend on effective lipid management, particularly LDL-C control. Combining omega-3 supplementation with advanced lipid-lowering therapy may be critical for maximizing their protective impact on cardiovascular health.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive genetic analysis of the human lipidome identifies novel loci controlling lipid homeostasis with links to coronary artery disease 97%
- Whole genome sequence analysis of blood lipid levels in >66,000 individuals 96%
- Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 95%
- Mouse Model of Heart Attack and Stroke Shows Improved Survival with MPO Inhibition 94%
- Genetically downregulated interleukin-6 signaling is associated with a favorable cardiometabolic profile: a phenome-wide association study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolite Signature of Life’s Essential 8 and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease among Low-Income Black and White Americans 95%
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 95%
- Augmenting clinical risk prediction of cardiovascular disease through protein and epigenetic biomarkers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.