Back

Global burden, trends, and projections of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal elderly women from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis based on GBD and Mendelian randomization

Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Rong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shuang, W.-b.

2025-09-02 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.08.28.25334618 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread disease in women; however, the global burden and trend of POP in postmenopausal women (PMW) remain poorly characterized. MethodsBased on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), this study assessed the burden and risk factors of POP in PMW worldwide. We employed the slope index of inequality (SII) and concentration index (CI) to evaluate regional health inequalities. Additionally, age-period-cohort (APC) analysis was integrated with the Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) model to examine temporal trends and project future disease burden trends. Furthermore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationships between risk factors and POP. ResultsFrom 1990 to 2021, the global incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of POP in PMW increased by 92.96%, 85.21%, and 83.78%, respectively. However, in 2021, the global age-standardized disability rate (ASDR) of POP was 16.21% lower than in 1990. Notably, regions with a low sociodemographic index (SDI) experienced statistically significant increases in disease burden. Additionally, individuals with obesity faced a higher risk of POP, while those with higher education levels had a lower risk. According to the BAPC model, global cases of POP among PMW are projected to reach 114.67 million by 2050, while the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) is expected to decline by only 3.49%. ConclusionThe global burden of POP among PMW has increased in total cases, despite declining age-standardized rates. Aging populations are projected to further exacerbate this burden, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to address high-risk populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.