Community-Based Helicobacter pylori Screening in High-Risk U.S. Populations: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study to Inform Gastric Cancer Prevention and Migration-Informed Risk Modeling
Hyun, C.; Oh, S. S.; Hong, S. H.; Shin, J. I.
Show abstract
IntroductionGastric cancer (GC) remains a persistent and underrecognized health disparity in the United States, disproportionately affecting immigrant communities from East Asia, Latin America, and other high incidence regions. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a WHO Group 1 carcinogen and the leading modifiable risk factor for non cardia GC, remains largely unaddressed in U.S. screening guidelines, despite successful international eradication programs. Methods and AnalysisThis prospective, mixed methods study will enroll 2,000 adults aged 30 to 80 from Asian, Hispanic, and other high risk racial/ethnic backgrounds across the Greater New York area. Participants will be recruited through partnerships with trusted community organizations. Each will complete a multilingual survey and undergo H. pylori testing (urea breath test), with confidential follow up and referral. The survey will assess demographic, clinical, and KAP (knowledge, attitudes, practices) variables. A migration informed risk index will be developed using logistic regression and validated using k fold cross validation and bootstrap resampling. Ethics and DisseminationApproved by the Yale University IRB, with informed consent obtained in preferred languages. Results will be disseminated through community forums, peer reviewed publications, academic conferences, and policy briefings. Strengths and Limitations of This StudyO_LICulturally and linguistically sensitive screening and navigation strategies tailored to high-risk immigrant populations C_LIO_LIFirst U.S.-based effort to develop a migration-informed risk index for H. pylori using clinical, demographic, and KAP data C_LIO_LICombines multilingual outreach and venue-based recruitment with predictive modeling to inform risk-stratified screening C_LIO_LIEnables detailed assessment of screening barriers and supports a multidimensional prevention framework C_LIO_LILimitations include potential selection bias, limited geographic generalizability, and reliance on self-reported data; external validation will be necessary C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 92%
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 90%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 92%
- Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial 92%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Southern European Prospective Investigation Into Childhood Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC kids ): Study Design and Protocol 91%
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 91%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 92%
- Diagnosing Influenza Infection from Pharyngeal Images using Deep Learning: Machine Learning Approach 88%
- Socio-educational Impact and Psychological Distress of Medical Students amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Japanese Cross-Sectional Survey 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal study of blood microbiome responses to milk reintroduction in healthy volunteers: A prospective, single-arm crossover study protocol 89%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 87%
- Power calculations for detecting differences in efficacy of fecal microbiota donors 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.