Do intramural career development programs provide an advantage to rehabilitation scientists applying for merit-review scientific funding? A retrospective cohort study.
Fraser, J. J.; Schwinder, E. J.; Spaniol, E. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) offers intramural Career Development Awards (CDAs). The purpose of this research was to investigate if completing a VHA CDA influenced the funding success rate for subsequent VHA Merit Review award applications in rehabilitation science. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of all applicants who submitted a VHA Merit Review award application to the Rehabilitation Research, Development, and Translation (RRDT) Broad Portfolio from fiscal year 2020 to 2025 was performed. The factors of experience as a prior CDA recipient and the number of application submissions on the success of funding was evaluated in early investigators and mid-career/senior scientists. ResultsEarly-career investigators with prior VHA CDAs (n=14) submitted 32 new/revised applications for VHA Merit Review award funding. While early investigators with prior VHA CDAs had a numerically higher percentage of funding across the three application submission cycles (34.4% vs 25.0%), this factor was not statistically significant. Mid-career and senior investigators with prior VHA CDAs (n=78) submitted 180 new/revised applications and demonstrated an overall 30.0% funding success across the three-application submission cycle. Mid-career and senior investigators with prior VHA CDAs had a statistically significant increased odds of funding across the three-application submission cycle (30.0% vs 26.4%; ORunadj:1.62; ORadj: 1.54). DiscussionWhile investigators with prior VHA CDAs did not have a significant advantage when applying for VHA Merit Review awards from ORDs RRDT Portfolio during the early-career phase, there was a statistically significant benefit observed in mid-career and senior scientists on the initial application submission or overall. ConclusionBased on the potential benefits of the mentored research experience within the VA Medical Centers observed in the current study and in preceding studies, early-career scientists interested in working with Veterans are encouraged to apply for these awards following completion of the terminal degree or post-doctoral fellowship.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 93%
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 92%
- Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 92%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 92%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 92%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 91%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.