Efficacy and safety of vasopressor use in adult patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock: systematic review
Shiozumi, T.; Sato, N.; Morikawa, S.; Tachino, J.; Inaba, M.; Naito, H.; Okada, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundTraumatic hemorrhagic shock is a critical condition caused by significant blood loss, leading to impaired tissue perfusion and high mortality. Although vasopressors such as noradrenaline and vasopressin are sometimes administered as adjuncts to fluid and blood product resuscitation, their role remains controversial due to concerns about end-organ perfusion and exacerbation of bleeding. ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vasopressor administration in adult patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. The review will assess effects on mortality, organ dysfunction, transfusion requirements, adverse events, and tissue perfusion. MethodsWe will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-randomized trials, comparing vasopressor use to standard care or no vasopressor in adult trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. Databases to be searched include CENTRAL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Ichushi-Web. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool will be used to assess study quality. Where appropriate, meta-analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed, and the certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. Expected ContributionBy synthesizing the available evidence, this review will help clarify the role of vasopressors in traumatic hemorrhagic shock, inform clinical practice and guidelines, and identify gaps for future research.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 94%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 94%
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early high-sensitivity troponin elevation in predicting short-term mortality in sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis 95%
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 95%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 93%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 93%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 92%
- Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review 91%
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 92%
- The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Liver Injury in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 91%
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.