Back

An internet-based survey of people with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the UK

Lindsay, H.; Yates, D.; Duley, L.

2025-08-12 hematology
10.1101/2025.08.05.25333089 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common adult blood cancer. There is no cure, but a third of people never require treatment and new targeted drugs have improved outcome. Understanding the experience of living with CLL is important for clinicians, health care providers and researchers. MethodsThis was an open internet-based survey of people with CLL, conducted by people with CLL. It was advertised via email and social media. Findings1,009 people completed the survey. Respondents were more likely to be women (526, 52% female; 482, 48% male) and were younger at diagnosis (574, 57% <71 years) than the general CLL population. For one third of respondents diagnosis was in the last five years. For 617 (61%) diagnosis was at a GP visit for another heath condition. 40% (406) reported no other health conditions. 558 (55%) respondents were currently on active monitoring, 261 (26%) were receiving treatment, and 190 (19%) in remission. Satisfaction with the speed of diagnosis, explanation of their CLL diagnosis and of the next steps in treatment was high. A quarter of respondents reported no current signs and symptoms of CLL, or side effects of treatment. Fatigue was reported by 578 (57%), three quarters of whom experienced this daily. Fatigue was reported to have a high impact on day-to-day life. Other common problems were bleeding and bruising more than normal (263, 26%) and getting infections often (228, 23%). From an emotional and a physical perspective, respondents reported their CLL had a higher impact on quality of life now than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Most respondents (829, 82%) received their treatment or monitoring at a hospital, for 253 (31%) contact was mostly/all remote. ConclusionsFatigue is a key problem for people with CLL. CLL impacts on the physical and emotional aspects of quality of life.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
5
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
9
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%