Isosorbide mononitrate / cilostazol for lacunar cerebral small vessel disease- outcomes at 6 months in the LACI-2 trial
Bath, P. M.; LACI-2 Trial Investigators, ; Woodhouse, L. J.; Mhlanga, I.; Bamford, J. M.; Cvoro, V.; Doubal, F.; England, T. J.; Hassan, A.; Montgomery, A. A.; O'Brien, J. T.; Roffe, C.; Sprigg, N.; Werring, D. J.; Wardlaw, J. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundLacunar stroke, a type of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), causes cognitive decline and dependency. The LACunar Intervention Trial-2 (LACI-2) trial showed that 12 months of treatment with isosorbide-mononitrate (ISMN) and/or cilostazol improved these outcomes. We tested whether this effect was present at 6 months, a pre-specified analysis. MethodsLACI-2 assessed the feasibility, safety and proof-of-concept of one year of ISMN (40-60mg) and/or cilostazol (200 mg) using a prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint 2x2-factorial phase-2b design. Participants aged>30yrs had clinical lacunar stroke, compatible brain imaging and capacity to consent. Key outcomes included cognition (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version 5-7-level, DSM5-7L), dependency, vascular events, mood, stroke impact and a global analysis of these. ResultsBaseline characteristics were balanced across 363 participants: median age 64 [56-72] years, females 31% and median onset-to-randomisation 79 [27-244] days. At 6 months, participants allocated to ISMN vs control had fewer vascular-cognition-dependency events (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.74, 95% confidence intervals 0.55-0.99) and an improved stroke impact scale score (Mann-Whitney difference, MWD - 0.15, 95% CI -0.25, -0.05) and global analysis (MWD -0.06, 95% CI -0.11, -0.01). Cilostazol vs control reduced cognitive impairment (DSM5-7-level scale, acOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.99). Combined ISMN/cilostazol vs control (n=181) had improved cognition (DSM5-7L acOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.78) and mood (Zung aMD -6.94, 95% CI -12.25, -1.64), reduced stroke impact (-0.23, 95% CI -0.37, -0.09) and a better global outcome (MWD -0.10, 95% CI -0.17, -0.03). ConclusionsImprovements in cognitive and functional outcomes were seen within 6 months of ISMN and/or cilostazol. Registration: ISRCTN14911850: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14911850
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- Risk, clinical course and outcome of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study 95%
- Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 90%
- Medium-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on multiple vital organs, exercise capacity, cognition, quality of life and mental health, post-hospital discharge 89%
- Cerebral venous thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study of 537,913 COVID-19 cases 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 90%
- Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during and 3 months after endovascular treatment in large-vessel occlusion stroke 90%
- Early functional connectivity alterations in contralesional motor networks influence outcome after severe stroke 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 98%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.