Back

Frailty and hospitalization in older adults with type 2 diabetes in Vietnam: a focus on sex disparities

Nguyen, T. V.; Truong, D. N.; Wong, W. J.; Woodward, M.; Nguyen, T.

2025-08-06 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.08.04.25332930 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOlder adults with diabetes often face multiple health challenges such as frailty. Frailty has been reported to be more common and severe in women than men, potentially due to a combination of biological, social and environmental factors. These sex-related differences in frailty may influence health outcomes, such as hospitalization rates. AimThis study sought to examine the prevalence of frailty in older adults with type 2 diabetes in an older population in Vietnam, and the association between frailty and hospitalizations, with a focus on sex disparities. MethodAn observational cohort study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Vietnam from November 2022 to June 2023. Patients aged 60 years or above with type 2 diabetes that visited the cardio-metabolic clinics during the study period were recruited. Frailty was measured using Frieds frailty criteria. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the association between frailty and all-cause hospitalization over 6 months. Ratios of odds ratios (ORs) were computed to quantify the sex difference. ResultsThere were 644 participants, with a mean age of 71.8 years (SD 7.6), and 30.0% were classified as frail. The prevalence of frailty in women was higher compared to men (31.3% vs 28.8%, p<0.001). The adjusted ORs of frailty on 6-month all-cause hospitalization were 2.71 (1.07 - 6.82) in women, and 1.92 (0.78 - 4.75) in men. ConclusionIn this study, frailty was more prevalent in women and was associated with an increased risk of hospitalizations in women than in men. This study adds to the understanding of how frailty and sex influence health outcomes in older adults with diabetes, implying the need for sex-specific approaches in managing diabetes in older adults.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.