Back

3D-Printed Prosthetic Socket Adapter for Clinical Simulation Use in Resource-Limited Environments

Oduro, P.; Bempah, C. O.; Osei-Wusu, S.; Boateng, J. A.; Opoku-Gyamfi, D.; Govindan, K.; Abiwu, N.

2025-08-05 medical education
10.1101/2025.08.03.25332912 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProsthetics and Orthotics (P&O) education in low-income nations faces significant challenges due to the prohibitive cost and limited availability of essential training materials, particularly prosthetic components like socket adapters. This scarcity directly impedes practical skill development, forcing a reliance on theoretical instruction. MethodologyA structured methodology integrating CAD modeling (Siemens NX12), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using Siemens NX Nastran, and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) with PLA filament on a Creality Ender 3 printer was employed. FEA simulations guided design refinements. FindingsPhysical prototype testing confirmed outstanding results. The adapter demonstrated dimensional accuracy with less than 0.1 mm deviation using a digital Vernier caliper, crucial for interoperability. Mechanical compression testing on an Instron 5944 UTM showed the prototype withstood a maximum load of 600 N before significant deformation, far exceeding simulation needs. Furthermore, fitting and compatibility tests confirmed a seamless and secure fit with standard transtibial prosthetic components. The final print quality was visually satisfactory with minimal post-processing. ConclusionThis work validates 3D printing as a highly effective, affordable, and reproducible solution for creating functional P&O training tools. Our findings offer a significant step towards democratizing access to practical prosthetic education globally, establishing a replicable framework for developing essential, locally manufactured training aids in various engineering and medical fields.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.