Back

Excimer Laser Ablation combined with Drug-coated Balloon for De novo Atherosclerotic Lesions in Lower Extremities

Jiang, X.; Yu, L.; Qiao, G.; Ju, S.; Fan, L.; Liu, H.; Zou, L.; Shi, Y.; Chen, B.; Jiang, J.; Ma, T.; Lin, C.; Fang, G.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Guo, D.; Fu, W.; Dong, Z.

2025-08-05 surgery
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332705 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe efficacy of excimer laser ablation (ELA) in de novo atherosclerotic lesions of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is unknown. ObjectivesThis real-world study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELA combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB alone in LEAD patients. MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, real-world trial (ChiCTR2100051263), patients with de novo atherosclerotic lesions of LEAD were enrolled and allocated to either ELA + DCB or DCB-alone group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency, with secondary endpoints including technical success, clinically driven target lesion reintervention (CD-TLR), and changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI). ResultsA total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, patients in the ELA + DCB group presented significantly higher Rutherford classification (3.7 {+/-} 0.9 vs. 4.2 {+/-} 1.0, p = 0.007) and longer mean lesion lengths (7.4 {+/-} 2.5 cm vs. 8.4 {+/-} 1.9 cm, p = 0.012). The ELA + DCB group demonstrated significantly superior 12-month primary patency (87.5% vs. 71.2%, p = 0.03) and technical success rates (92.7% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.046) compared to the DCB-alone group. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirmed sustained patency benefit with ELA + DCB (p = 0.015). ConclusionIn this real-world trial, ELA appears to be a promising therapy for LEAD in terms of safety and efficacy. However, these findings need to be corroborated by larger, randomized studies. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100051263

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
5
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
18
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%