Back

Liposomal iron bisglycinate hydrochloride, but not free iron bisglycinate, enhances serum iron restoration in a mouse model of inflammation-induced anemia

Kahana Sela, M.; Agbaria, A.; Omari Knani, N.; Awida, R.; Weizman, A.; Gavish, M.

2025-07-31 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.07.28.667108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesIron deficiency is a major global health concern, particularly in inflammation-related anemia (IRA), where iron absorption and mobilization are impaired. Liposomal encapsulation offers a promising strategy to enhance the bioavailability and efficacy of iron supplements. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of orally administered liposomal iron bisglycinate hydrochloride (LIBH), compared to free iron bisglycinate hydrochloride (FIBH), in restoring serum iron levels in a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced anemia of inflammation (LIAI). MethodsMale C57BL/6 mice received intraperitoneal LPS (5 mg/kg) to induce LIAI and were simultaneously treated with either FIBH or LIBH (1 mg/kg, oral). Liposomes (150 - 200 nm) exhibited high encapsulation efficiency (93%) and stability (-38 to -45 mV zeta potential). Serum iron levels were measured 24 hours post-treatment. ResultsLPS administration significantly reduced serum iron levels. LIBH restored serum iron levels by 35 - 65% compared to baseline (p < 0.005), outperforming FIBH (0 - 16%, p = NS). Electron microscopy confirmed the structural integrity of LIBH liposomes. ConclusionLIBH supplementation significantly improves serum iron levels in LIAI and may represent a superior alternative to traditional free iron therapy, particularly in inflammatory conditions. Further studies are warranted to assess its efficacy in other models of anemia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.