Back

Validation of the MAGIC genomic signature on RNAseq in soft-tissue sarcomas

Benhaddou, A.; Perot, G.; Rochaix, P.; Valentin, T.; Ferron, G.; chibon, f.

2025-07-21 oncology
10.1101/2025.07.19.25331113 medRxiv
Show abstract

(1) BackgroundGenomic Instability (GIN) plays a critical role in cancer progression and treatment response. Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), are characterized by high levels of chromosomal rearrangements and transcription-associated stress, both of which contribute to poor clinical outcomes. Current standard grading systems, such as FNCLCC, are limited in prognostic accuracy for STS, necessitating novel approaches for risk stratification and treatment guidance. To address this gap, we developed a holistic classifier, the MAGIC (Mixed transcription- and replication-associated GIN classifier), combining transcription- and replication-related GIN indices (iTRAC and iRACIN) to predict metastatic risk. (2) Patients and MethodsThis study utilized RNA sequencing (RNAseq) on 226 STS tumor samples to analyze fusions transcripts break points (BP) distribution and assess GIN. We computed MAGIC indices iTRAC and iRACIN, which are based on chromosomal instability linked to transcription and replication processes, respectively. iTRAC biomarker was evaluated against FNCLCC and CINSARC for metastatic risk stratification. Kaplan-Meier and iPART analyses were used to determine the prognostic relevance of iTRAC levels. (3) ResultsiTRAC significantly stratified patients with distinct metastatic outcomes, outperforming FNCLCC and CINSARC grading systems. STS patients with medium level of iTRAC showed the poorest metastasis-free survival. Patients classified as iTRAC high- and low-risk groups, achieved better prognosis. Furthermore, iTRAC stratified patients metastatic risk in treated and not treated patients, indicating poorer prognosis with chemotherapy in patients with low iTRAC and better for those with with medium iTRAC. (4) Conclusion(s)iTRAC demonstrates a superior prognostic utility in STS over current grading systems, effectively stratifying metastatic risk for patients who might benefit from alternative therapeutic strategies. iTRAC holds potential for personalizing chemotherapeutic approaches, paving the way for a new precision oncology approach in STS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
24
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%