Analyzing Conspiratorial Content Across Singapore-Based Telegram Groups
Goyal, A.; Ligo, V. A. C.; Cheung, L. Y.; Lee, R. K.-W.; Saha, K.; Tandoc, E. C.; Kumar, N.
Show abstract
Telegram has emerged as a key platform for the circulation of conspiratorial narratives. We examine conspiratorial discourse within Singapore-based Telegram groups from 2021-2025. We analyze over 10 million words from three Telegram groups. We developed a logistic regression classifier to detect conspiratorial content, achieving an F1 score of 0.74 and expert-validated labeling accuracy of 72%. Topic models indicated dominant themes centered around elite control, vaccine risks, and globalist agendas. While most users rarely posted conspiratorial content, a small, highly active minority accounted for most of such messages. These users frequently forwarded messages across multiple groups, amplifying the spread of content with short but intense lifecycles (mean lifespan=6.8 days). Network analysis showed that users typically joined multiple groups in rapid succession and that conspiratorial messages traveled across groups within weeks. We underscore the importance of user-centric monitoring, time-sensitive interventions, and platform-specific models for content detection.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 95%
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 94%
- Developing an automatic system for classifying chatter about health services from Twitter: A case study for Medicaid 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists 92%
- Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation 92%
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward Using Twitter Data to Monitor Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy 92%
- (Mis) Communicating The Gut Microbiome: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Social Media Video Content 91%
- Iterative Development of a Mobile Phone Application to Support Community Health Volunteers during Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of large language models as a scalable approach to understanding public health discourse 94%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 92%
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 91%
- Speaker responses to audience-induced social-evaluative threat: Evidence from scientific presentation tasks in immersive virtual reality 90%
- Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Medical Final Examination 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.